Disability
A disability may be physical, cognitive,
mental, sensory, emotional, developmental or some combination of these. A
disability may be present from birth, or occur during a person's lifetime.
Disabilities is an umbrella term, covering
impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. An impairment
is a problem in body function or structure; an activity limitation is a
difficulty encountered by an individual in executing a task or action; while a participation
restriction is a problem experienced by an individual in involvement in
life situations. Thus disability is a complex phenomenon, reflecting an
interaction between features of a person’s body and features of the society in
which he or she lives.[1]
An individual may also qualify as disabled if he/she
has had an impairment in the past or is seen as disabled based on a personal or
group standard
or norm.
Such impairments may include physical, sensory, and cognitive
or developmental
disabilities. Mental
disorders (also known as psychiatric or psychosocial disability) and
various types of chronic
disease may also qualify as disabilities.
Some advocates object to describing certain conditions
(notably deafness
and autism)
as "disabilities", arguing that it is more appropriate to consider
them developmental differences that have been unfairly stigmatized by society.[2]
Types of
disability
Disability is caused by impairments to various
subsystems of the body – these can be broadly sorted into the following
categories.
Physical
disability
Any impairment which limits the physical function of
limbs or fine or gross motor ability is a physical disability. Other physical
disabilities include impairments which limit other facets of daily living, such
as severe sleep apnea.
Sensory
disability
Sensory disability is impairment of one of the senses.
The term is used primarily to refer to vision and hearing impairment, but other
senses can be impaired.
Visual
impairment
Main article: Visual impairment
Visual impairment (or vision impairment) is vision loss (of a
person) to such a degree as to qualify as an additional support need through a
significant limitation of visual capability
resulting from either disease,
trauma, or congenital
or degenerative conditions that cannot be corrected by conventional means, such
as refractive correction, medication, or surgery.[3][4][5] This
functional loss of vision is typically defined to manifest with
- best corrected visual acuity of less than 20/60, or significant central field defect,
- significant peripheral field defect including homonymous or heteronymous bilateral visual, field defect or generalized contraction or constriction of field, or
- reduced peak contrast sensitivity with either of the above conditions.[3][4][5][6]
Hearing
impairment
Hearing impairment or hard of hearing or deafness
refers to conditions in which individuals are fully or partially unable to
detect or perceive at least some frequencies of sound which can typically be
heard by most people. Mild hearing loss may sometimes not be considered a
disability.
Olfactory and
gustatory impairment
Impairment of the sense of smell and taste are
commonly associated with aging but can also occur in younger people due to a
wide variety of causes.
There are various olfactory disorders:
- Anosmia – inability to smell
- Dysosmia – things smell different than they should
- Hyperosmia – an abnormally acute sense of smell.
- Hyposmia – decreased ability to smell
- Olfactory Reference Syndrome – psychological disorder which causes patients to imagine they have strong body odor
- Parosmia – things smell worse than they should
- Phantosmia – "hallucinated smell", often unpleasant in nature
Complete loss of the sense of taste is known as ageusia, while dysgeusia is
persistent abnormal sense of taste,
Somatosensory
impairment
Insensitivity to stimuli such as touch, heat, cold,
and pain are often an adjunct to a more general physical impairment involving
neural pathways and is very commonly associated with paralysis (in which the
motor neural circuits are also affected).
Balance
disorder
A balance disorder is a disturbance that causes an
individual to feel unsteady, for example when standing or walking. It may be
accompanied by symptoms of being giddy, woozy, or have a sensation of movement,
spinning, or floating. Balance is the result of several body systems working
together. The eyes (visual system), ears (vestibular system) and the body's
sense of where it is in space (proprioception) need to be intact. The brain,
which compiles this information, needs to be functioning effectively.
Intellectual
disability
Intellectual disability is a broad concept that ranges
from mental retardation to cognitive deficits too mild or too specific (as in specific learning disability) to qualify as mental
retardation. Intellectual disabilities may appear at any age. Mental retardation
is a subtype of intellectual disability, and the term intellectual
disability is now preferred by many advocates in most English-speaking
countries as a euphemism
for mental retardation.
Mental health
and emotional disabilities
A mental disorder or mental illness is a psychological
or behavioral pattern generally associated with subjective distress or
disability that occurs in an individual, and perceived by the majority of
society as being outside of normal development or cultural expectations. The
recognition and understanding of mental health conditions has changed over time
and across cultures, and there are still variations in the definition,
assessment, and classification of mental disorders, although standard
guideline criteria are widely accepted.
Developmental
disability
Developmental disability is any disability that
results in problems with growth and development. Although the term is often used
as a synonym or euphemism for intellectual disability, the term also
encompasses many congenital medical conditions that have no mental or
intellectual components, for example spina bifida.
Nonvisible
disabilities
Several chronic disorders, such as diabetes, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease or epilepsy, would be
counted as nonvisible disabilities, as opposed to disabilities which are
clearly visible, such as those requiring the use of a wheelchair.
Sociology of
disability
People-first
language
Many people would rather be referred to as a person
with a disability instead of handicapped. "Cerebral Palsy: A Guide for
Care" at the University
of Delaware offers the following guidelines:[7]
Impairment is the correct term to use to define a
deviation from normal, such as not being able to make a muscle move or not
being able to control an unwanted movement. Disability is the term used to
define a restriction in the ability to perform a normal activity of daily
living which someone of the same age is able to perform. For example, a three
year old child who is not able to walk has a disability because a normal three
year old can walk independently. Handicap is the term used to describe a child
or adult who, because of the disability, is unable to achieve the normal role
in society commensurate with his age and socio-cultural milieu. As an example,
a sixteen-year-old who is unable to prepare his own meal or care for his own
toileting or hygiene needs is handicapped. On the other hand, a
sixteen-year-old who can walk only with the assistance of crutches but who
attends a regular school and is fully independent in activities of daily living
is disabled but not handicapped. All disabled people are impaired, and all
handicapped people are disabled, but a person can be impaired and not
necessarily be disabled, and a person can be disabled without being
handicapped.
The American Psychological Association style guide states
that, when identifying a person with an impairment, the person's name or
pronoun should come first, and descriptions of the impairment/disability should
be used so that the impairment is identified, but is not modifying the person.
Improper examples are "a borderline", "a blind person",
or "an autistic
boy"; more acceptable terminology includes "a woman with Down syndrome"
or "a man who has schizophrenia".
It also states that a person's adaptive equipment should be described
functionally as something that assists a person, not as something that limits a
person, e.g., "a woman who uses a wheelchair" rather than "a
woman in/confined to a wheelchair."
A similar kind of "people-first" terminology
is also used in the UK, but more often in the form "people with
impairments" (e.g., "people with visual impairments"). However,
in the UK, the term "disabled people" is generally preferred to
"people with disabilities". It is argued under the social model that while someone's impairment (e.g.,
having a spinal cord injury) is an individual property, "disability"
is something created by external societal factors such as a lack of wheelchair
access to the workplace.[8] This
distinction between the individual property of impairment and the social
property of disability is central to the social model. The term "disabled people" as a
political construction is also widely used by international organisations of
disabled people, such as Disabled Peoples' International (DPI).
Literature
Masculinity
According to author Daniel J. Wilson, the
characteristics of masculinity
include strength, activeness, speed, endurance, and courage. These
characteristics are often challenged when faced with a disability and the boy
or man must reshape what it means to be masculine. For example, rather than
define "being a man" through what one can physically do, one must
re-define it by how one faces the world with a disability and all the obstacles
and stereotypes that come
with the disability.[9]
In Leonard Kriegel's book, Flying Solo, he
describes his fight with poliomyelitis
and the process of accepting his disability in a world that values
able-bodiedness. He writes, "I had to learn to be my own hero, my own role
model – which is another way of saying that I had to learn to live with
neither heroes nor role models" (pg. 40).[10]
Femininity
Some note that women who are disabled face what is
called a "double disability", meaning they must not only deal with
the stereotypes and challenges posed by femininity, but they
must also deal with those posed by being disabled. Culture also tends to view
women as fragile and weaker than men, stereotypes which are only heightened
when a woman has a disability.[9]
According to the "Survey of Income and Program
Participation", as described in the book Gendering Disability, 74
percent of women participants and 90 percent of men participants without
disabilities were employed. In comparison, of those with a form of disability,
41 percent of women and 51 percent of men were employed. Furthermore, the
nondisabled women participants were paid approximately $4.00 less per hour than
the nondisabled men participants. With a disability, women were paid
approximately $1.00 less than the nondisabled women participants and the men
were paid approximately $2.00 less than the nondisabled men participants. As
these results suggest, women without disabilities face societal hardships as
compared to men, but disability added to the equation increases the hardships.[9]
Theory
The International Classification of
Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), produced by the World
Health Organization, distinguishes between body functions (physiological
or psychological, e.g., vision) and body structures (anatomical parts, e.g.,
the eye and related structures). Impairment in bodily structure or function is
defined as involving an anomaly, defect, loss or other significant deviation
from certain generally accepted population standards, which may fluctuate over
time. Activity is defined as the execution of a task or action. The ICF lists 9
broad domains of functioning which can be affected:
- Learning and applying knowledge
- General tasks and demands
- Communication
- Basic physical mobility, Domestic life, and Self-care (i.e., activities of daily living)
- Interpersonal interactions and relationships
- Community, social and civic life, including employment
- Other major life areas
In concert with disability scholars, the introduction
to the ICF states that a variety of conceptual models has been proposed to
understand and explain disability and functioning, which it seeks to integrate.
These models include the following:
The medical
model
The medical model is presented as viewing disability
as a problem of the person, directly caused by disease, trauma, or other health
condition which therefore requires sustained medical care provided in the form
of individual treatment by professionals. In the medical model, management of
the disability is aimed at a "cure," or the individual’s adjustment
and behavioral change that would lead to an "almost-cure" or
effective cure. In the medical model, medical care is viewed as the main issue,
and at the political level, the principal response is that of modifying or
reforming healthcare policy.[11][12]
The social
model
The social model (also, minority-group model)
of disability sees the issue of "disability" as a socially created
problem and a matter of the full integration of individuals into society (see Inclusion (disability rights)). In this model,
disability is not an attribute of an individual, but rather a complex
collection of conditions, many of which are created by the social environment.
Hence, the management of the problem requires social action and it
is the collective responsibility of society at large to make the environmental
modifications necessary for the full participation of people with disabilities
in all areas of social life. The issue is both cultural and ideological,
requiring individual, community, and large-scale social change. From this
perspective, equal access for someone with an impairment/disability is a human
rights issue of major concern.[13][12]
Other models
- The spectrum model refers to the range of visibility, audibility and sensibility under which mankind functions. The model asserts that disability does not necessarily mean reduced spectrum of operations.
- The moral model refers to the attitude that people are morally responsible for their own disability.[14] For example disability may be seen as a result of bad actions of parents if congenital, or as a result of practicing witchcraft if not. This attitude may also be viewed as a religious fundamentalist offshoot of the original animal roots of human beings when humans killed any baby that could not survive on its own in the wild. Echoes of this can be seen in the doctrine of karma in Indian religions.
- The expert/professional model has provided a traditional response to disability issues and can be seen as an offshoot of the medical model. Within its framework, professionals follow a process of identifying the impairment and its limitations (using the medical model), and taking the necessary action to improve the position of the disabled person. This has tended to produce a system in which an authoritarian, over-active service provider prescribes and acts for a passive client.[15]
- The tragedy/charity model depicts disabled people as victims of circumstance who are deserving of pity. This, along with the medical model, are the models most used by non-disabled people to define and explain disability.[16]
- The legitimacy model views disability as a value-based determination about which explanations for the atypical are legitimate for membership in the disability category. This viewpoint allows for multiple explanations and models to be considered as purposive and viable.[17]
- The social adapted model states although a person’s disability poses some limitations in an able-bodied society, oftentimes the surrounding society and environment are more limiting than the disability itself.[18]
- The economic model defines disability in terms of reduced ability to work, the related loss of productivity and economic effects on the individual, employer and society in general.[19] This model is directly related to the charity/tragedy model.[citation needed]
- The empowering model (also, customer model)allows for the person with a disability and his/her family to decide the course of their treatment and what services they wish to benefit from. This, in turn, turns the professional into a service provider whose role is to offer guidance and carry out the client’s decisions. This model “empowers” the individual to pursue his/her own goals.[18]
- The market model of disability is minority rights and consumerist model of disability that recognizing people with disabilities and their stakeholders as representing a large group of consumers, employees and voters. This model looks to personal identity to define disability and empowers people to chart their own destiny in everyday life, with a particular focus on economic empowerment. By this model, based on US Census data, there are 1.2 billion people in the world who consider themselves to have a disability. An additional two billion people are considered stakeholders in disability (family/friends/employers), and when combined to the number of people without disabilities, represents 53% of the population.[citation needed] "This model states that, due to the size of the demographic, companies and governments will serve the desires, pushed by demand as the message becomes prevalent in the cultural mainstream."[12]
- The consumer model of disability is based upon the “rights-based" model and claims that people with disabilities should have equal rights and access to products, goods and services offered by businesses. The consumer model extends the rights-based model by proposing that businesses, not only accommodate customers with disabilities under the requirements of legislation, but that businesses actively seek, market to, welcome and fully engage people with disabilities in all aspects of business service activities. The model suggests that all business operations, e.g., websites, policies and procedures, mission statements, emergency plans, programs and services, should integrate access and inclusion practices. Furthermore, these access and inclusion practices should be based on established customer service access and inclusion standards that embrace and support the active engagement of people of all abilities in business offerings.[20]
Management
Assistive
technology
Assistive
Technology is a generic term for devices and modifications (for a
person or within a society) that help overcome or remove a disability. The
first recorded example of the use of a prosthesis dates to
at least 1800 BC.[21] The wheelchair dates from
the 17th century.[citation
needed] The curb cut
is a related structural innovation. Other examples are standing frames, text
telephones,
accessible keyboards,
large print, Braille, & speech
recognition software.
People with disabilities often develop personal or community adaptations, such
as strategies to suppress tics in public (for example in Tourette's
syndrome), or sign
language in deaf communities.
Main articles: Web accessibility and
Design
for All (in ICT)
As the personal computer has
become more ubiquitous, various organizations have formed to develop
software and hardware
to make computers more accessible for people with disabilities. Some software
and hardware, such as Voice
Finger, Freedom
Scientific's JAWS,
the Free and Open Source alternative Orca etc. have been specifically designed for
people with disabilities while other software and hardware, such as Nuance's
Dragon
NaturallySpeaking, were not developed specifically for people with
disabilities, but can be used to increase accessibility.[citation
needed] The LOMAK
keyboard was designed in New
Zealand specifically for persons with disabilities.[citation
needed]
Adapted sports
The Paralympic Games
(meaning "alongside the Olympics") are held after the (Summer and
Winter) Olympics. The
Paralympic Games include athletes with a wide range of physical disabilities.
In member countries organizations exist to organize competition in the
Paralympic sports on levels ranging from recreational to elite (for example, BlazeSports
America in the United States).
The Paralympics developed from a rehabilitation
programme for British war veterans with spinal injuries. In 1948, Sir Ludwig
Guttman, a neurologist working with World War II veterans with spinal injuries
at Stoke
Mandeville Hospital in Aylesbury in the UK,
began using sport as part of the rehabilitation programmes of his patients.
In 2006, the Extremity Games was
formed for people with physical disabilities, specifically limb loss or limb
difference, to be able to compete in extreme sports.[citation
needed]
Discrimination,
government policies, and support
United Nations
On December 13, 2006, the United Nations
formally agreed on the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities, the first human rights treaty of the 21st
century, to protect and enhance the rights and opportunities of the world's
estimated 650 million disabled people. As of April 2011, 99 of the 147
signatories had ratified the Convention.[22] Countries
that sign the convention are required to adopt national laws, and remove old
ones, so that persons with disabilities will, for example, have equal rights to
education, employment, and cultural life; to the right to own and inherit
property; to not be discriminated against in marriage, etc.; to not be
unwilling subjects in medical experiments.
In 1976, the United Nations
launched its International Year for Disabled Persons (1981), later renamed the International Year of Disabled Persons.
The UN Decade of Disabled Persons (1983–1993) featured a World Programme of
Action Concerning Disabled Persons. In 1979, Frank Bowe was the
only person with a disability representing any country in the planning of
IYDP-1981. Today, many countries have named representatives who are themselves
individuals with disabilities. The decade was closed in an address before the
General Assembly by Robert
Davila. Both Bowe and Davila are deaf. In 1984, UNESCO accepted sign language for use
in education of deaf children and youth.
Costa Rica
Under the Ley de Igualdad de Oportunidades (Law
of Equal Opportunities), no person can be discriminated by their disabilities
if they are equally capable as another person. This law also promotes that
public places and transport should have facilities that enable people with
disabilities to access them.
May 28 is the DÃa Nacional de la Persona con
Discapacidad (National Disabled People Day) to promote respect for this
population.
Currently the political party Partido de Acceso Sin Exclusión
(Access Without Exclusion Party) fights for the rights of disabled persons, and
one congressman, Oscar
López, is blind.
United Kingdom
Under the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) (1995, extended in
2005), it is unlawful for organisations to discriminate (treat a disabled
person less favourably, for reasons related to the person's disability, without
justification) in employment; access to goods, facilities, services; managing,
buying or renting land or property; education. Businesses must make
"reasonable adjustments" to their policies or practices, or physical
aspects of their premises, to avoid indirect discrimination.[23]
Since 2010 the Disability Discrimination Act has been
replaced with the Equality Act 2010. This act still protects disabled people
against discrimination but also encompasses a number of other characteristics
including age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage, pregnancy, race,
religion, sex and sexual orientation.[24]
A number of financial and care support services are
available, including Incapacity
Benefit and Disability Living Allowance.[25]
Employment
The Employers' Forum on Disability (EFD) is a membership
organisation of UK businesses. Following
the introduction of the DDA the membership of EFD recognised the need for a
tool with which they could measure their performance on disability year on
year.
In 2005 80 organisations took part in the Disability
Standard benchmark providing the first statistics highlighting the UK's performance as a nation of employers.
Following the success of the first benchmark Disability
Standard 2007 saw the introduction of the Chief Executives' Diamond Awards for
outstanding performance and 116 organisations taking the opportunity to compare
trends across a large group of UK employers and monitor the progress they had
made on disability.
2009 will see the third benchmark, Disability
Standard 2009. EFD have promised that for the first time they will
publish a list of the top ten performers who will be honoured at an award
ceremony in December 2009.[26]
United States
Discrimination
in employment
The US Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requires all organizations
that receive government funding to provide accessibility programs and services.
A more recent law, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(ADA), which came into effect in 1992, prohibits private employers, state and
local governments, employment agencies and labor unions from discriminating
against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing,
advancement, compensation, job training, or in the terms, conditions and
privileges of employment. This includes organizations like retail businesses,
movie theaters, and restaurants. They must make "reasonable
accommodation" to people with different needs. Protection is extended to
anyone with (A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one
or more of the major life activities of an individual, (B) a record of such an
impairment, or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment. The second and
third criteria are seen as ensuring protection from unjust discrimination based
on a perception of risk, just because someone has a record of impairment or
appears to have a disability or illness (e.g. features which may be erroneously
taken as signs of an illness).
African
Americans and disability
According to the 2000 U.S. Census, the African American
community has the highest rate of disability at 20.8 percent, slightly higher
than the overall disability rate of 19.4%.[27] Although
people have come to better understand and accept different types of disability,
there still remains a stigma attached to the disabled community. African
Americans with a disability are subject to not only this stigma but also to the
additional forces of race discrimination. African American women who have a
disability face tremendous discrimination due to their condition, race, and
gender. Doctor Eddie Glenn of Howard University describes this situation as the
"triple jeopardy" syndrome.[28]
Social Security
Administration
The US Social Security Administration defines disability in
terms of inability to perform substantial gainful activity (SGA), by which it
means “work paying minimum wage or better”. The agency pairs SGA with a
"listing" of medical conditions that qualify individuals for
benefits.
Education
Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
special educational support is limited to children and youth falling into one
of a dozen disability categories (e.g., specific learning disability) and adds
that, to be eligible, students may require both special education (modified
instruction) and related services (supports such as speech and language
pathology).
Insurance
It is illegal for California insurers to refuse to
provide car
insurance to properly licensed drivers solely because they have a
disability.[29] It is also
illegal for them to refuse to provide car insurance "on the basis that the
owner of the motor vehicle to be insured is blind," but they are allowed
to exclude coverage for injuries and damages incurred while a blind unlicensed
owner is actually operating the vehicle (the law is apparently structured to
allow blind people to buy and insure cars which their friends, family, and
caretakers can drive for them).[29]
Demographics
Estimates
worldwide
Estimates of worldwide and country-wide numbers of
individuals with disabilities are problematic. The varying approaches taken to
defining disability notwithstanding, demographers agree that the world
population of individuals with disabilities is very large. For example, in
2004, the World
Health Organization estimated a world population of 6.5 billion
people, of those nearly 100 million people were estimated to be moderately or
severely disabled.[30] In the
United States, Americans with disabilities constitute the third-largest
minority (after persons of Hispanic origin and African Americans); all three of
those minority groups number in the 30-some millions in America.[30] According
to the U.S.
Bureau of the Census, as of 2004, there were some 32 million
disabled adults (aged 18 or over) in the United States, plus another 5 million
children and youth (under age 18). If one were to add impairments—or
limitations that fall short of being disabilities—Census estimates put the
figure at 51 million.[31]
There is also widespread agreement among experts in
the field that disability is more common in developing than in developed
nations.
Nearly eight million men in Europe returned from the World War I
permanently disabled by injury or disease.[32]
About 150,000 Vietnam veterans came
home wounded, and at least 21,000 were permanently disabled.[33] Increased
US military involvement has resulted in a significant increase of disabled
military personnel since 2001. According to Fox News, this is a '25 percent'
rise, with more than '2.9 million' total veterans now disabled.[34]
After years of war in Afghanistan, there are more than
one million disabled people.[35]
Afghanistan has one of the highest incidences of people with disabilities in
the world.[36] An
estimated 80,000 Afghans have lost limbs, mainly as a result of landmines.[37]
Political
issues
Political rights,
social inclusion and citizenship have come
to the fore in developed and some developing countries. The debate has moved
beyond a concern about the perceived cost of maintaining dependent people with
disabilities to an effort of finding effective ways to ensure that people with
disabilities can participate in and contribute to society in all spheres of
life.
Many are concerned, however, that the greatest need is
in developing nations—where the vast bulk of the estimated 650 million people
with disabilities reside. A great deal of work is needed to address concerns
ranging from accessibility and education to self-empowerment and
self-supporting employment and beyond.
In the past few years, disability rights activists
have also focused on obtaining full citizenship for the disabled.
However obstacles reside in some countries in getting
full employment, also public perception of disabled people may vary in areas.
Disability
rights movement
The disability rights movement is the movement
to secure equal opportunities and equal rights for people with disabilities.
The specific goals and demands of the movement are: accessibility and safety in transportation,
architecture, and the physical environment, equal opportunities in independent
living, employment, education, and housing, and freedom from abuse, neglect,
and violations of patients' rights.[38] Effective
civil rights legislation is sought in order to secure these opportunities and
rights.[38][39]
Disability
insurance
Disability benefit, or disability
pension, is a major kind of disability
insurance, and is provided by government agencies to people who are
temporarily or permanently unable to work due to a disability. In the U.S.,
disability benefit is provided within the category of Supplemental Security Income, and in Canada, within the
Canada
Pension Plan. In other countries, disability benefit may be provided
under Social
security systems.
Costs of disability pensions are steadily growing in
Western countries, mainly European and the United States. It was reported that
in the UK, expenditure on disability pensions accounted for 0.9% of Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) in 1980, but two decades later had reached 2.6% of GDP.[40][41] Several
studies have reported a link between increased absence from work due to
sickness and elevated risk of future disability pension.[42]
A study by researchers in Denmark suggests that
information on self-reported days of absence due to sickness can be used to
effectively identify future potential groups for disability pension.[41] These
studies may provide useful information for policy makers, case managing
authorities, employers, and physicians.
Private, for-profit disability insurance plays a role
in providing incomes to disabled people, but the nationalized programs are the
safety net that catch most claimants.
References
2.
^ Solomon, Andrew. "The New Wave of Autism
Rights Activists". New York Magazine. Retrieved October 30,
2011.
3.
^ a b
Arditi, A., & Rosenthal, B. (1998). "Developing an objective
definition of visual impairment." In Vision '96: Proceedings of the
International Low Vision Conference (pp. 331–334). Madrid, Spain: ONCE.
4.
^ a b "Medicare Vision
Rehabilitation Services Act of 2003 HR 1902 IH". Library of
Congress. May 1, 2003. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
5.
^ a b larrybelote.com[dead
link]
9.
^ a b c
Gendering Disability, Bonnie G. Smith and Beth Hutchison, ed., (New Jersey: Rutgers
University Press, 2005). ISBN 0-8135-3373-2
12. ^ a b c Donovan 2012,
p. 12.
14. ^ Kaplan, Deborah. "Disability Model".
World Institute on Disability. Retrieved October 30, 2011.
18. ^ a b Nikora et al. 2004,
p. 7.
19. ^ "Economic Model of
Disability". Michigan Disability Rights Coalition. Retrieved
August 11, 2012.
20. ^ Smith, T.B. (2012). A New and Emerging Model of Disability: The
Consumer Model. White Paper. The Pennsylvania State University
21. ^ "Disability Social History
Project – Timeline". Disabilityhistory.org. Retrieved
August 11, 2012.
22. ^ "UN Enable – Promoting the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities". United Nations. Retrieved August
11, 2012.
23. ^ http://www.drc-gb.org/the_law/legislation__codes__regulation/dda_and_related_statutes.aspx[dead
link]
24. ^ "Independent Living Guide
to Equality Act 2010 and How to Deal with Discrimination".
Independentliving.co.uk. October 1, 2010. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
26. ^ information on Employers' Forum on Disability (EFD) and Disability
Standard edited from the official websites EFD.org.uk and Disabilitystandard.com
29. ^ a b "CAL. INS. CODE §
11628 : California Code – Section 11628".
Caselaw.lp.findlaw.com. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
30. ^ a b "Desease incidence,
prevalence and disability". Global Burden of Disease.
World Health Organization. 2004. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
32. ^ Kitchen, Martin (2000) [1980]. Europe Between the Wars. New
York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-41869-0. OCLC 247285240.
36. ^ "Afghanistan: People living with
disabilities call for integration". IRIN Asia. December 2, 2004.
37. ^ Norton-Taylor, Richard. "Afghanistan's refugee crisis
'ignored'". London: The Guardian. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
38. ^ a b "Disability Rights
Wisconsin". Disabilityrightswi.org. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
39. ^ Bagenstos, Samuel (2009). Law and the Contradictions of the
Disability Rights Movement. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12449-1.
40. ^ OECD. Transforming disability into ability: Policies to promote work
and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD Publication Offices. 2003
41. ^ a b
Labriola, M.; Lund, T. (2007). "Self-reported sickness absence as a risk
marker of future disability pension. Prospective findings from the DWECS/DREAM
study 1990–2004". International Journal of Medical Sciences:
153–158. doi:10.7150/ijms.4.153. edit
42. ^ Virtanen M, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Sund R, Virtanen P,
Ferrie JE. Sickness absence as a risk factor for job termination, unemployment,
and disability pension among temporary and permanent employees. Occup Environ
Med. 2006;63(3):212–7
Citations
- DePoy, Elizabeth; Gilson, Stephen French (2004). Rethinking Disability: Principles for Professional and Social Change. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole. ISBN 978-0-534-54929-9.
- Donovan, Rich (March 1, 2012). "The Global Economics of Disability". Return on Disability. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
- Nikora, Linda Waimari; Karapu, Rolinda; Hickey, Huhana; Te Awekotuku, Ngahuia (2004). "Disabled Maori and Disability Support Options". Maori & Psychology Research Unit, University of Waikato. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
Further reading
Books
- Albrecht, Gary L., ed. (2005). Encyclopedia of disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-0-7619-2565-1.
- Bowe, Frank (1978). Handicapping America: Barriers to disabled people. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-010422-1.
- Glenn, Eddie (1995). "African American Women with Disabilities: An Overview". In Walker, S.; Turner, K. A.; Haile-Michael, M. et al.. Disability and diversity: New leadership for a new era. Washington, DC: President’s Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities and Howard University Research and Training Center for Access to Rehabilitation and Economic Opportunity.
- Johnstone, David (2001). An Introduction to Disability Studies (2nd ed.). Fulton. ISBN 978-1-85346-726-4.
- Masala, Carmelo; Petretto, Donatella Rita (2008) (in Italian). Psicologia dell'Handicap e della Riabilitazione [The Psychology of Handicap and Rehabilitation]. Rome: Kappa. ISBN 978-88-15-06226-0.
- Oliver, Michael (1997). The Politics of Disablement. London: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-333-43293-8.
- Pearson, Charlotte (2006). Direct Payments and Personalisation of Care. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-903765-62-3.
- Shakespeare, Tom; with Anne Kerr (1999). Genetic Politics: from Eugenics to Genome. Cheltenham: New Clarion Press. ISBN 978-1-873797-25-9.
Journals
- Burch, Susan (July 2009). "(Extraordinary) Bodies of Knowledge: Recent Scholarship in American Disability History". OAH Magazine of History 23: 29–34. ISSN 0882-228X.
- Kaushik, R. (1999). "Access Denied: Can we overcome disabling attitudes". Museum International (UNESCO) 51 (3): 48–52. ISSN 1468-0033.
- Lansing, Michael J. (January 2009). "'Salvaging the Man Power of America': Conservation, Manhood, and Disabled Veterans during World War I". Environmental History 14: 32–57. ISSN 1084-5453.
- Longmore, Paul (2009). "Making Disability an Essential Part of American History". OAH Magazine of History 23: 11–15. ISSN 0882-228X.
- Masala, Carmelo; Petretto, Donatella Rita (2008). "From disablement to enablement: conceptual models of disability in the 20th century". Disability and Rehabilitation 30 (17): 1233–1244. ISSN 0963-8288.
Source:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia